Obama Budget Drops Bomb on HME

President’s 2012 plan calls to link NCB cuts to Medicaid reimbursement rates.

President Obama has released his 2012 budget, and it proposes to leverage the national competitive bidding program to drive further cuts to HME funding.

Two key proposals in the President’s plan are to tie Medicaid reimbursement rates for HME to the rates generated by CMS’s national competitive bidding program; and to require mandatory pre-payment review for all power wheelchair claims.

When it comes to linking Medicaid rates to NCB rates for HME, the president’s budget says doing so will “strengthen the Medicaid program” and save $6.4 billion over 10 years.

“The Medicare program is in the process of implementing innovative ways to increase efficiency for payment of durable medical equipment (DME) through the durable medical equipment, prosthetic, orthotic items or services (DMEPOS) Competitive Bidding Program, which is expected to save more than $17 billion in Medicare expenditures over ten years,” the President’s plan reads. “The first proposal extends some of these efficiencies to Medicaid, by limiting Federal reimbursement for a State's aggregate Medicaid spending on certain DME services to what Medicare would have paid in the same State for the same services.”

Not surprisingly, the President’s suggestion elicited a strong industry response:

“This proposal would be a disaster for the already-strapped HME sector,” said Tyler Wilson, president and CEO of the American Association for Homecare. “It would merely accelerate the race to the bottom in terms of reduced access to medically required home equipment and services and drive even more qualified home medical equipment providers out of business. As it gets harder and harder to obtain quality equipment and care at home, this ill-conceived idea will merely drive up costs in other parts of our healthcare system such as hospitals, emergency rooms, and long-term care facilities.

The president’s budget listed the implementation of pre-payment review for all power wheelchairs under its “program integrity” section, and projected a $240 million savings over 10 years. The Administration said the reviews would reduce the improper payment rates.


“Preliminary data suggest that the error rate for power wheelchairs is excessively high,” the budget reads. “Payment for equipment that does not meet existing rules for Medicare coverage increases costs for the Medicare program and for taxpayers.”  

A statement from AAHomecare said the proposal “heaps additional burdens on power wheelchair providers who are already reeling from severe reimbursement cuts, the loss of the first-month purchase option, and numerous, onerous regulations that second-guess physicians’ orders for power wheelchairs for seniors and people with disabilities.”

All told, the budget prescribes Medicare and Medicaid-related cuts and an expansion of generic drug use to gain a $62 billion savings. These stiff cuts, including those for the HME sector, will help pay for a two-year “doc fix” to increase pay to physicians, that is also included in the budget.

 


About the Author

David Kopf is the Editor of HME Business.

Comments

Thu, Mar 3, 2011 dan ohio

i think the gov. has forgotten how much money homecare has saved them over the last 30 yrs. we can provide oxygen ,nebulizer ,bed ,and wheelchair to the patient at home for a year , for less than it cost to stay in the hospital for a day or 2.clearly without oxygen and nebs at home there would be a considerable number of increased hospital admissions.its a shame that the people that hav worked all their lives and paid into the system all these years are facing cuts to their healthcare .

Fri, Feb 25, 2011

I was under the assumption Obama wanted to create jobs and turn the economy around, was I wrong? Making anymore additional cuts to the DME business would substantially cut jobs in the larger DME companies and will eventually lead to the closing of the smaller DME companies. That is the job side of it, now lets look at the healthcare side out it. Does he not understand that by providing DME equipment in a patient's home we cut down on the costs of the expense of Nursing homes. Does he not understand by providing respiratory equipment we are cutting down on the trips to the hospital. Does he also not understand by being able to provide DME equipment we are cutting down on the number of days a patient stays in the hospital. I think himself and Biden need to visit area DME companies and listen to what we have to say.

Wed, Feb 23, 2011

I have been saying for years, the government is trying to run providers out of business. This way they can come in and say "See, there aren't enough providers so we have to take over your healthcare". This way they are not blatant about it.

Tue, Feb 22, 2011 Kenny Ohio

Wow! Spend millions over seas and make our own people suffer! "Obama and Biden, are the leaders who will bring the change our country needs"...taken off their website when they ran for President and VP. This kind of change I can do with out!

Tue, Feb 22, 2011 Tennessee

Feb 22 the SBA is holding a forum to explore how to stimulate small business. Most DMEs are businesses of under 10 employees and competitive bidding puts 90% of us out of business and it is coming to an area near you. Anyone see a disconnect here?

Mon, Feb 21, 2011

Ok, so good luck to the papaplegics and multiple sclorosis patients of the USA, and those senior citizens who contributed their whole lives to a program and are not entitled to the benefits they need.

Mon, Feb 21, 2011 Fed Up Texas

What about hospital reimbursement cuts? Hospitals are responsible for most of the Medicare budget. Wouldn't that be a "logical" place to reduce spending? Has anyone noticed the marble floors, granite counters, and five star accomadations at their local hospital? Where do they get the money for all those ammenities? From Medicare!

Fri, Feb 18, 2011 Spider Tennessee

In this state alone one half million citizens are subjected to Medicaid supply pricing that is marginal at best and under cost frequently. Citizens do not choose to be a client of Medicaid. When reimbursement is below cost, it is just a defacto means of discrimination for a largely disenfranchised population. How can the federal government allow such?

Fri, Feb 18, 2011

Who voted for this guy anyway, I know I did not..

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Webcast

Round Two: What's Your Plan C?

While we all want to plan around the hope of being a winner in Round Two of National Competitive Bidding, smart providers must shape their backup strategies to keep running despite the loss of a key category or bid area.

Find out more